Reaching Out

May 3rd, 2010

How much of your money did Betty Sutton spend to reach out to you?

Betty Sutton Spends $118838.00

Betty Sutton Used Our Tax Dollars to Print and Mail Campaign Literature

All members of Congress benefit from what is known as a “franking” privilege, a chance to reach constituents without paying postage or fees.  Here is a comparison of spending from three area representatives for the year 2009.

LaTourette

$5,950.00

Kucinich

$62,404.00

Sutton

$146,643.00

According to Kim Wendel of WKYC, the total cost on the look-at-me mailings Sutton sent to residents of OH-13 had a final price tag of $143,036. We heard nothing from the congresswoman all year,  then,  just as we entered primary season, Sutton saw a need to reach out and..

“communicate with residents throughout the 13th District.” – Sutton

Just a little something to think about as you head off to the polls.

Tough Economic Times

April 5th, 2010

Sutton’s Job-Killing Agenda Leaves Ohio Families Desperate for Recovery

Economic Outlook Unnerving as the Democrats Continue their Job-Killing Campaign

Washington- After weathering the rough economic storm over the past year and with unemployment at an abysmal 9.7 percent, Ohio families are desperate for economic recovery. Rather than working to create jobs and providing relief to struggling middle-class families, Betty Sutton continues to green-light billions in wasteful spending only to stimulate big-government growth at the expense of private sector jobs. Less than two weeks ago, Sutton rubber-stamped a job-killing healthcare takeover that is so politically toxic it has Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) Chairman Van Hollen predicting “stormy waters” ahead for Democrats.

“’Rep. Chris Van Hollen is seeking both to calm and unify his party as it enters what he calls ‘dangerous waters ahead.’

“With healthcare reform now law, Democratic leaders are shifting into a new phase, reassuring and advising nervous members who have huge targets on their backs.” (Aaron Blake, “Van Hollen warns of ‘dangerous waters,’” The Hill, 3/31/2010)

The Democrats’ job-killing healthcare bill will not only force companies to lay off employees, but will come at a huge financial cost as well:

“Boeing Co. will take a charge of $150 million due to the recent health care overhaul legislation, the aircraft maker said Wednesday. The charge will hurt earnings by 20 cents per share in the first quarter of 2010. In 2013 Boeing will no longer be able to claim an income tax deduction related to certain prescription drug benefits for retirees.” (“Boeing to take charge on health care reform,” Associated Press, 3/31/10)

“On top of AT&T’s $1 billion, the writedown wave so far includes Deere & Co., $150 million; Caterpillar, $100 million; AK Steel, $31 million; 3M, $90 million; and Valero Energy, up to $20 million. Verizon has also warned its employees about its new higher health-care costs, and there will be many more in the coming days and weeks.” (“The ObamaCare Writedowns,” Wall Street Journal, 3/27/2010)

“The effects of this portion of the health care bill have concerned several of the 35,000 people employed in the lending industry. Phillip Walsh, a senior director at Sallie Mae’s office in Fishers, said the company will lose approximately 2,500 of its 8,500 jobs.” (Holly Heerdink, “Loan providers forced to cut employees,” Indiana Daily Student, 3/25/2010)

Much to the dismay of Ohio families, the few jobs that have been produced since Democrats took control of the White House and Congress have been government jobs with looming expiration dates:

“The ADP survey tallies only private-sector jobs, while the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ nonfarm payroll data, to be released Friday, include government workers. The addition of workers for the 2010 census is expected to lift federal government payrolls.” (Kathleen Madigan, “Private Payrolls Drop,” Wall Street Journal, 3/31/2010)

Also, the help from census hiring is a temporary boost, at best. Most census workers will only be employed for a matter of months.” (Ian Swanson, “Positive March jobs figures to bolster Obama, but horizon cloudy,” Politico, 3/30/2010)

While middle-class families in Ohio continue to look for economic recovery on the horizon, Betty Sutton has been busy rubber-stamping a job-killing agenda in Washington,” said NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain. “By supporting her party’s agenda of higher taxes, fewer jobs, and bigger government, Sutton is on the hook for the country’s 9.7 percent unemployment rate.  After repeatedly neglecting economic solutions in favor of partisan politics, Sutton may have already guaranteed her own unemployment when voters go to the polls on Election Day.”

nrcc.org

Announcements from the Money Tree

April 5th, 2010

Part 1

Is Betty Sutton The Money Tree?

Our elected representative, Congresswoman Betty Sue Sutton, has been tough to find since the election of 2008.  Perhaps it is because of all the hard work she is doing to save jobs in Ohio’s thirteenth congressional district.  Maybe it is because of all the time she spends reading each and every bill.  Whatever the reason, Sutton should make time to answer a few question.

In the last few months, announcements on the congresswoman’s official website have been coming fast and furious.  Many of these announcements deal with grant money being awarded to organizations within the district.  A read of the headlines on her website makes the her look like the proverbial money tree.

Strangely absent from each announcement is mention of the people who tirelessly work to secure these dollars. Sutton is quick to suggest her own hand in the efforts by publishing the announcements, but how much work did she really do?

If the representative had a major role in securing these grant dollars, then I am left wondering why she is playing favorites among organizations within the district.  Furthermore, if Sutton had a major role in securing these grants, why is the federal grant process not based solely on the merit of the applicants?  Are we really handing out tax dollars because the representative likes organization X more than Y and Z?

On the other hand, if the representative had little or nothing to do with the grants, then I must ask why she publishes these announcements on her official website in a way that implies her involvement.  Is our representative attempting to pass off the work of others as her own?

You can expect more on this topic.

Buy American

February 11th, 2010

Betty Sutton - hypocrite

Betty Sutton - Hypocrite

One of Congresswoman Sutton’s pet projects has been a push to include ‘Buy America’ language in the house Jobs Bill (H.R. 2847).  Through this, Sutton hopes to create and protect American jobs.  For the moment, I’ll leave aside the opinions of experts and historians who disagree with this approach and believe it will ultimately do more harm than good.   Instead, I want to concentrate on our representative’s commitment to this philosophy.

Last year, on NPR, speaking of her Buy American Provisions, Sutton said,

“It just ensures that American tax dollars are supporting American workers doing the work that we need to have done.”

More recently, on December 16, 2009, Sutton published a press release to her official website in which she said the following,

“At a time when unemployment is at 10 percent in this country, it is critical now more than ever that we stand with American workers and businesses.  As we invest in our nation’s infrastructure and manufacturing, the American taxpayers expect that the projects and products made will be produced in America by American workers.”

If, as Sutton believes, keeping federal tax dollars within our national borders is a positive move for American workers, then it would stand to reason that buying goods and services from the 13th district of Ohio would be good for the worker of the district.

Practice What You Preach

“When liberalism conflicts with reality, reality must give way.” – Quinn’s Law

It was not long ago that Betty took $118,838 of your tax dollars to produce a pair of self-promoting mailings.  The publishing company chosen by Sutton to complete this controversial task was the Mount Vernon Printing Company.  For those of you following along at home, the Mount Vernon Printing Company is located in Landover, MD (MD-4).

Certainly, with only a small amount of research, Sutton’s staff could have located a printing company within the borders of Ohio’s thirteenth district. Instead, the Congresswoman took nearly $120,000 which had been entrusted to her, as the representative of OH-13, and spent it to support her own campaign and the workers of Maryland’s 4th district.  This was done at a time when Ohio’s unemployment rate has nearly topped 11 percent.

You cannot have it both ways, Betty.  If your ideas are good, then enact them in your own daily work.

Betty Sutton

Look-At-Me

Knowing how busy you have been I decided to save you some work and have drafted a “Buy OH-13” plan for you:

  1. All business transactions completed by your offices will follow a strict “Buy OH-13” policy.
  2. If a project or purchase must be completed by a company from outside our district, then you must publish on the Internet within 30 days a detailed, written justification as to why the product or service cannot be completed by an OH-13 business.  It will also be necessary for you to including the amount of tax dollars being spent.
  3. For any wavier to this plan, you shall provide, as part of the written justification, a statement detailing the short and long term impacts of the waiver on OH-13 employment.
  4. You can request a waiver based on “unavailability/insufficient district source” only if after publishing your request on the Internet for at least 5 business days a sufficient OH-13 source of the material, product, or service does not identify itself during the period.

My plan will slow down the work of your offices, and I understand that it is an inefficient and expensive way to conduct business, however, as my grandmother use to say,

“ What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

On Your Dime.

February 2nd, 2010

Betty Sutton Spends $118838.00

Betty Sutton Campaign Literature Scandal

Despite the tireless work of Congresswoman Betty Sutton’s political machine, her recent “Look-At-Me” newsletter scandal is not going away.  With a  price tag of $118,838 it is  going to be around for a quite a while.  The “Look-At-Me” scandal is a priceless example of Sutton’s disconnect with the citizens of OH-13.  Her reckless tax and spend attitude is embodied in these mailings.  This issues is far from over and will remain a thorn in Sutton’s side for some time to come.

Today, Bob Dyer of the Beacon Journal took another well deserved shot at Betty.  In his article, Dyer contrasted Sutton’s recent literature with that of state Senator Coughlin’s.

When it comes to communicating with constituents, U.S. Rep. Betty Sutton could take a lesson from state Sen. Kevin Coughlin.

As we told you a few weeks ago, Sutton, D-Copley Township, recently blanketed her district with two brochures that could have come straight from Madison Avenue. Both — fully financed by you — were glorious, full-color, six-page brochures praising her legislative efforts.

In short, the ”newsletters” were campaign literature.

Last week, the folks in my ZIP code got another political mailing, this one from Coughlin, R-Cuyahoga Falls. His newsletter looks like something the local PTA might put together: a simple, black-and-white foldout with a couple of grainy photos.

One of the interior pages is devoted to asking voter opinions on seven issues. The other discusses two bills he has introduced.

When asked about the bare-bones effort, Coughlin said, ”I try to avoid political rhetoric, opting instead to highlight a couple of legislative initiatives and to survey citizens on a wide range of issues.”

The best part about it: He seems genuinely interested in taking the public pulse. The questions are neutral, such as, ”Do you support or oppose a proposal that would extend the school year by 20 days?”

Read more @ ohio.com