Where’s Betty?

April 29th, 2010

More Arrogance and Disrespect From Washington

The 13th District Candidates’ Forum, hosted by the Brunswick Community, included Democrat Justin Wooden; and Republicans James Brihan, Bill Haney, Jim Hrubik, Jason Meade and Todd Sharkey.  By most accounts the event was a success and a credit to the efforts of the Brunswick community.

“The moderators were great. I liked that they let the candidates ask each other questions. This kept it from being one big hug-fest with everyone agreeing on everything,” P. Bolyard – via meetup.com

Where was Betty Sutton that night?  Absent as usual.  Being absent from the district is nothing new…

LaPrensaToledo.com April 14, 2010

“Democrats Betty Sutton: Speaking on her behalf was Liz Walters, field representative, as Sutton did not attend the forum because she was needed in Washington, D.C. Incumbent Sutton is serving…“

This time, this story has a little twist. It started behind the scenes on the morning of April 21.

In an email sent to Brunswick Mayor Gary Werner, Jason Fink, Sutton’s Scheduler, announced that Congresswoman Sutton was unavailable and would be sending a proxy, Liz Walters, to read a prepared statement during the event.

In response to his email, Fink was told that the event was “a candidates’ forum, not a surrogates’ forum,” and organizers would not allow candidate representatives to read prepared statements during the event.   Fink was also told that changing the forum’s format would be unfair to the participating candidates.

This response hit a nerve with Sutton’s staff, because a very short time later, aggressive phone calls were placed from Washington to Mayor Werner and Vice Mayor Patrick.  In one call, Sutton’s Chief of Staff, Nichole Reynolds, said that she was upset with the forum policy and felt that the Mayor had not properly considered Sutton’s schedule when planning the event.

This is a good time to point out that planners of the event had contacted Sutton’s office not one, but twice, in the previous two months.  Each time, they invited the congresswoman to participate in the forum.  There was no response from Sutton’s office until the day of the event.

In a follow-up email, Nichole wrote: “We regret that you will not permit this [proxy speaker] to take place and allow the people to at least hear from their representative.”

That evening, one of Sutton’s representatives, who was in attendance, complained that Brunswick had made last minute changes concerning the use of surrogates.  He went on to insinuate that the Mayor had poorly planned the event’s timing.

To make such accusations against the host was in poor taste. Brunswick made every effort to include Sutton in the event.  What remains to be answered is why Sutton felt the sudden need to jump in the forum at the last moment.  Why didn’t her office contact Brunswick sooner? If she is so concerned about the people hearing from their representative, she might consider spending some time in the district and actually talking to her constituents instead of leaving it to her assistants.

“The Mayor and Vice Mayor, Republican and Democrat, did an outstanding job with the event. It was quick, it was informative and original in its application. Obviously considerable forethought was put into this event, and I truly believe that this debate served the interests of civil discourse, the city of Brunswick and the 13th district as a whole. My hat’s off to the Mayor and Vice Mayor for their professionalism in the face of immature antics and tantrums!” – Justin Wooden

“This simply shows a shockingly arrogant lack of respect by the Party endorsed candidates to both the City of Brunswick and the voters of the 13th Congressional District.  I am very disappointed in both.” – Jason Meade

THE EVENT – More intimidation

The forum began at 7PM with the candidate seated at the front of the room.  Two seats were left empty, one each for Sutton and Ganley.

Some at the event felt security was higher than normal for such a small program and wondered if Police were expecting a problem. The Mayor’s office dismissed this and said Police were simply expecting a larger crowd.

About an hour into the forum, a noisy group of Sutton supporters entered the room.  Each wearing a Betty Sutton campaign sticker and many wore clothing identifying themselves as union members.  The group is believed to have come from a Democrat meeting held that evening at the nearby library.

One attendee reported that only moments before the Sutton Supporters entered the room, the congresswoman’s Field Representative, Elizabeth Walters took a phone call and walked out with Mark Derrick to where the Sutton supporters would latter enter.

“[They] showed up 3/4 of the way through the evening and loudly made their way into the room, some to seats in the front row. After a few minutes, most of them left, again, noisily. A couple of them stuck around to rant to members of the crowd about healthcare or whatever their issues were. It was very, very odd!” – P Bolyard – via meetup.com

“They came in with an attitude intent on intimidating everyone there.” – Tom Fenske.

In an orchestrated move, one of the Sutton supporters, wearing a UAW jacket, emerged from the crowd and moved to the front of the room.  After a short period of standing, the man took a seat in the first row.

“He looked like he wanted a confrontation.” – Tom Fenske.*

“[He was] kind of menacing, sitting forward in his chair and shaking his head, glaring and making gagging gestures,” Steve S.

The man spent much of his time looking with hostility toward the Mayor and Vice Mayor.  At one point, Mayor Werner had to gesture to this man to keep  quiet after the man had shouted, “That’s just your opinion!” at one of the candidates.

At that time a Brunswick police officer quietly positioned himself between the man and the mayor.  While the UAW man’s actions seemed quite deliberate and intent on disrupting the event, he failed to do so.  The mayor didn’t miss a beat, and kept the forum moving smoothly to its conclusion.

Did Sutton’s staff call in these union thugs?  Did they arrive with the intent of disrupting the event?   There is certainly a resemblance to the pair of recent events where Sutton is known to have used unions to intimidate her opposition.

Connections aside, the big question remains: Where was Betty?  Why hasn’t she been able to sit down with the public in the last two years for a face-to-face meeting? The excuse of having to be in DC for legislative work, does not explain her appalling absence for the last 4 years. Nor does it explain her ability to pop into the district for a press conference earlier this week, or as keynote speaker at the 24th Ohio Employee Ownership Conference on Friday April 30 at the Hilton Akron/Fairlawn.

Betty will not face the people in an open forum, and it is time for the congresswoman to say why.

Perhaps Jason Meade said it best, it is an “arrogant lack of respect.”

*revised 4-30-2010

Beat It Betty

April 25th, 2010

Betty Sutton - Beat it Betty Beer - Goooh

Beat It Betty - Goooh.com

The folks at Goooh are having a little fun with a very serious issue.  If you are not familiar with the Goooh project you should check it out.

If you are tired of career politicians, GOOOH is for you. If you believe money has corrupted Washington, GOOOH is for you. If you believe politicians have too much power, GOOOH is for you. If you are weary of the death grip the two parties have on our government, and are ready to return control of our government to the people, then GOOOH is for you.

Visit the Goooh website for more information on their plans to get Congresswoman Sutton and her comrades out of the house.

Screw You OH-13

October 23rd, 2009

B.S., Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is.

pork
Betty Sutton brags about spending money we don’t have

When it comes to federal dollars, Congresswoman Betty Sutton certainly has been bragging about her pork projects.  Clearly she has no problem spending other people’s money if it means buying votes in OH-13, but what about her own campaign dollars?  Dose Sutton put her money where her mouth is?  Do her campaign expenditures reflect a commitment to the economic success of OH-13?

A quick look at the congresswoman’s reported campaign spending*, as listed by the Federal Election Commission, shows a couple of suspect entries.

The first of these occurred on June 1, 2009.  That was the day Sutton forgot all about Akron and one of the finest Double-A baseball teams in the nation.  The Akron Aeros, named for Akron’s work in aerospace research, are a great value in local entertainment.  Moreover, the team’s presence in downtown Akron benefits the local economy and keeps jobs in the district.

Where did Sutton’s money go?  We don’t have to look far; a quick trip into Ohio’s 11th U.S. house district will lead right to the home of the Cleveland Indians.  It was from the Indians that Sutton purchased gift tickets for her donors.

Betty Sutton's Motto - Screw You 13!

Betty Sutton's Motto - Screw You 13!

But wait, the Aeros were not the only losers in this little geographic blunder.  Sutton also managed to screw a minor league baseball team on the other end of OH-13.  Avon, Ohio is home to the Lake Erie Crushers.   Just as the Aeros have done for Akron, the Crushers are providing a positive economic impact on Avon and the surrounding area.

Where else did Sutton spend campaign dollars that could have been pumped into our local economy? That’s right, another 11th district recipient: Cleveland, Ohio’s Cavaliers sold Sutton $374 dollars worth of tickets on June 01, 2009.

It’s clear that Betty Sutton is only in this for the power and glory of Betty.  We have shown time and time again that the representative has little regard for the economy of OH-13.  Sutton votes against the interests of this district at every turn.  Although it may be small dollars this time, the congresswoman’s purchases represent yet another example of Betty’s unofficial motto, “Screw You 13!”

What say you Betty Sutton?

* Center for Responsive Politics

Cash For Fetuses

September 23rd, 2009

Betty Sutton Wants Health Care With Abortion?

Betty Sutton Wants Health Care With Abortion?

AUDIO CLIP:  Sutton On HR3200 & Abortions

The 13th district Tele-Town-Hall may have been a flop, but it did provide concrete reference points regarding Rep. Betty Sutton’s understanding of H.R. 3200 and the potential implications of the bill if passed.  For now, I won’t go as far as to say that our congresswoman lied about abortion funding, but I do question her understanding of the the complex bill.

President Obama, Secretary Sebeilus, Speaker Pelosi, Senator Reid and Congresswoman Sutton have repeatedly told us that the health care proposal under consideration does not include provisions to cover abortion.  Perhaps that is true, but if these supporters of the plan aren’t misleading us, then why is our legislative branch unwilling to attach language that explicitly forbids the funding of abortion.  Such amendments have come up and each time they are defeated.  Could it be that there is a little abortion in there after all?

Recently, there was an informative opinion article on abortion funding published by the Washington Times.  In that article, Charmain Yoest laid out the ways federal funding of abortion could easily entrench itself into national health reform without being written into the bill.

Yoest points out that it all comes down to the definition of health care – not today, but in the future.  H.R. 3200 may not state, “the federal government will not pay for abortion,” but it does cover health care and if groups like Planned Parenthood have their way, the definition of health care will soon include abortion.  A single change in definition by our court system will magically cause the people of Ohio’s thirteenth district to be on the hook for federally subsidized abortions.

A simple solution to block this loophole has been offered by Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan.  Certainly amid her busy schedule of parades, chili cook offs, fundraisers and speaking engagements Sutton could find time to show support for Stupak’s amendment.  Not so.  In fact, when the amendments came up for a committe vote on 7/31/09 Betty voted them down.

On an amendment that would excluded any mandate for abortion coverage, except to save the
mother’s life and in cases of rape or incest.  Betty Sutton voted NO.

On an amendment specifying that no funds authorized by the Act may be used to pay for any abortion or cover the costs of any health plan that includes coverage for abortion, except to save the mother’s life or in cases of rape or incest. Betty Sutton voted NO.

When asked if the representative would support Stupak’s fight for a vote on the Hyde Amendment, Betty Sutton’s office said she does not support Stupak because H.R. 3200 does not provide federal funding for abortions.

If the representative is unwilling to support Stupak or the Hyde Amendment, perhaps she could use her leadership skills to craft her own amendment to keep federal funds from paying for abortions under H.R. 3200.  After all, she told us at the Tele-Town-Hall that H.R. 3200 would not pay for abortions.  It’s time for the representative to back those words with action.  It would only take a moment and would show that she represents the values of her constituents in the 13th district.

Rep. Sutton, if you won’t support Stupak’s Amendment, you see no need for the Hyde Amendment, and you won’t speak up to demand that such language be added before the big vote, then what are we to think of you and your intentions? Are you planning another program,  perhaps “Cash for fetuses?”

It just might be time to change my opinion of you.  In the words of Congressman Joe Wilson… You Lie.


Sutton’s Record on Abortion

  • 2008 Representative Sutton supported the interests of Planned Parenthood 100% of the time.
  • 2007-2008 Representative Sutton supported the interests of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association 100% of the time.
  • 2007 In 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America gave Representative Sutton a grade of 100.

record data: VoteSmart.org

Where’s Betty Sutton? Shame on the Columbus Dispatch

September 20th, 2009

Betty Sutton “Speaks Out”: What should U.S. do? Ohio’s lawmakers weigh in on the Afghan war

Congresswoman Betty Sutton Takes a Well Deserved Rest

Congresswoman Sutton Takes a Well Deserved Rest.

After her landmark speech at the West Virginia Federation of Democratic Women’s annual meeting, Betty Sutton is certainly due for a period of rest and relaxation. It’s for this reason that I say pooh-pooh on you Jonathan Riskind and the Columbus Dispatch for pointing out that Betty Sutton failed to meet a deadline.

Not included

Rep. Betty Sutton, D-Akron, did not respond in time to include her comments.

If you, Mr. Riskind, or your paper were worth a dime, you would know that the representative of Ohio’s 13th district is quite busy representing our interests in far away places like West Virginia.   How can she possibly be expected to meet a ridiculous deadline from a rag like the Columbus Dispatch. Shame on you for not holding this article until Betty’s response arrived, however long that might have taken (at least three weeks in many cases).

Seriously, Betty, could you try to do a little less gallivanting around the countryside and be a bit more accessible? Look at the list of representatives who managed to respond to Jonathan Riskind’s simple question:

Rep. Steve Driehaus, OH-1 D
Rep. Jean Schmidt, OH-2 R
Rep. Mike Turner, OH-3 R
Rep. Jim Jordan, OH-4 R
Rep. Bob Latta, OH-5 R
Rep. Charlie Wilson, OH-6 D
Rep. Steve Austria, OH-7 R
Rep. John Boehner, OH-8 R
Rep. Marcy Kaptur, OH-9 D
Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, OH-10 D
Rep. Marcia Fudge, OH-11 D
Rep. Pat Tiberi, OH-12 R
Rep. Betty Sutton, OH-13 D
Rep. Steven C. LaTourette, OH-14 R
Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy, OH-15 D
Rep. John Boccieri, OH-16 D
Rep. Tim Ryan, OH-17 D
Rep. Zack Space, OH-18 D

That’s right, ALL OF THEM ARE LISTED EXCEPT YOU! Every other representative managed to step up and make a statement.  What happened Betty?

The man was only asking for 250 words (or less). Are you really that busy? Or, could it be that you are just afraid to answer tough questions?

Where’s Betty Sutton? – Take me home, country roads.

September 16th, 2009

In this week’s edition of  “Where’s Betty” we find our intrepid explorer, Betty Sutton, heading for coal country.

Betty Sutton visits West Virginia

Betty "Keep'n it Green" Sutton to visit Coal Country - West Virginia

Sometimes when I think back on all the great Town- Hall meetings we didn’t have with Congresswoman Betty Sutton, I get a little irritated.  But then something like the West Virgina Federation of Democratic Women’s annual meeting brings it all back into perspective.  When I see events like this, I step back and try to be more understanding of the representatives new found fame as “The Clunker”.

Congresswoman Betty Sutton is one of the hottest commodities going on the lecture circuit, and it would be wrong for us to expect her to make time for local radio shows, conservative groups, or individual constituents. Betty is a free thinking congressional leader after all,  and although she represents the 13th district of Ohio, we must always remember that Betty “The Clunker” Sutton is a representative of everyone.

The West Virginia Federation of Democratic Women will have the annual meeting beginning 2 p.m. Friday and continuing through Sunday at the Weirton Holiday Inn, 350 Three Springs Drive, Weirton. Rep. Betty Sutton, D-Ohio, will be among keynote speakers Saturday. Other speakers include Gov. Joe Manchin; Rep. Alan Mollohan and his wife, Barbara; Secretary of State Natalie Tennant; State Treasurer John Perdue; House Speaker Rick Thompson, and state Sen. Jeff Kessler. Sutton was the key author of the “Cash for Clunkers” program and serves on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. wvgazette.com

For those keeping track, Weirton, WV is nearly 100 miles Southeast of the 13th district’s southern boarder.  The travel time alone would be enough for a real Town-hall meeting.

Thanks for everything Betty!

But it’s a jobs bill!

September 16th, 2009

Obama Admin: Cap And Trade Could Cost Families $1,761 A Year

read the story at: www.cbsnews.com

Ok, this makes me laugh a little.  When I called Sutton’s Washington office the evening of the Cap & Trade vote, the congresswoman’s staffer told me that numbers like these were highly inflated.  He even went as far as to suggest that such numbers were nothing more than lies from the bill’s opponents.  “In fact,” he said, “the congresswoman has looked at this carefully and believes it will only raise energy bills by less than a dollar per month.”

Oh, Betty, will you ever wake up and recognize that Ohio’s 13th isn’t in California?

The People vs. Betty Sutton

September 14th, 2009

The 9/12 DC Tea Party should be an eye opener to our congressional representatives.  Will Betty finally listen?

Congresswoman,

On September 10th, you were quoted by the Cleveland Plain Dealer as saying:

“The costs of the status quo are unsustainable and the current system leaves far too many without care when they need it. I share President Obama’s determination to deliver meaningful health-care reform to the American people, but the details matter. I remain committed to continuing to work for a system that will provide the people I am so honored to represent with choices and affordable access to quality effective care.”

On September 12th a crowd of unprecedented size gathered at your Washington D.C. doorstep with one clear message: We don’t want your health reform (HR 3200).

Betty, it’s time for you to represent the will of the people.

September 12 Must See

September 11th, 2009

It’s not a Betty Sutton video, but she should watch it. Then she can try to explain to all of us why she seems to disagree.

It’s tough to argue with the founding fathers. That reminds me, when is Betty going to answer the constitution question from the telephone-town-hall?

Betty Sutton, Pay Attention.

September 8th, 2009

Betty Sutton

Dear Congresswoman Betty Sutton,

The game is about to change.  The people have had enough.  We are bringing our grievances directly to your Washington D.C. door step.

You can hide.  You can cower in fear of the truth.  You can conspire with your leadership against this district.  But know this, we are coming.  We will surround your palace.  We will be heard.

We the People